The comments in this essay are restricted to the simple kinds of application problems studied in elementary algebra classes. These problems lead to one or more equations (or inequalities) to be solved. Problems requiring calculus or more advanced mathematics are not considered here.
There are three phases to solving application problems with mathematics. The first
phase is to translate the application problem into a strictly mathematics statement(s).
These statements are called the mathematics model and will be equations or
inequalities. The second phase is to solve the equations or inequalities.
The third and final phase is to translate the solution into a meaningful response
to the application problem. The first phase is by far the most difficult of the
three, phase three is generally not too difficult, and the second phase is easy provided
the solver has learned a bit of elementary algebra. At this point in the essay we
will cease writing “or inequalities”.
When variables are assigned to the quantities in a particular problem and an equation is
derived, the problem has been divorced from the particular application and is at that
point a purely mathematical problem. All peculiarities of the application are stripped
away so as not to confuse or interfere with the solution process.
The algebraic skills required to solve the equations are the subject of courses like
Elementary Algebra, Intermediate Algebra, College Algebra, Trigonometry, and PreCalculus.
Throughout these same courses application problems (the dreaded word problems) are
presented. The traditional presentation frequently results in a hodge-podge of ideas
and methods rather than a coherent view of the process. This essay is an attempt to
teach a more unified approach to creating the mathematics model.
In many instances the model is a well established formula. In such cases, the
information in the problem must be interpreted in terms of the variables in the
formula. The known values are substituted for the appropriate variables and the
resulting equation is solved for the unknown variable. For example, to determine
the height of a 24 cu.ft. cylinder with radius 2 ft., the radius and volume are
substituted into the familiar formula V = πr2h
to obtain 24 = 4πh which is solved for h to obtain
.
Of course a well established formula is completely worthless to the investigator if
he/she is not aware of the formula and the meaning of the variables in the formula.
An educated adult is aware of and understands many basic formulas about geometric shapes
as well as formulas like d= rt and is therefore expected to be able to answer simple
questions involving those formulas. On the other hand, most people do not know
much about resistors in electrical circuits. So if the question is what single
resister is equivalent to three resistors in parallel, the solver must find the proper
formula. A simple Google search for “resistors in parallel” quickly
produces the desired formula
and the question is easily answered.
One reason mathematics is used to answer questions in every discipline is because it is a detached language. Mathematics is called a detached language because when a problem from any discipline has been modeled with mathematics, all reference to the original discipline has been removed. The model is detached from the peculiarities and imprecision of language and the discipline itself. The question can be answered without reference to the original discipline. Consider the following incomplete list of very simple formulas together with a very brief explanation of their meanings in the discipline where they arise.
| d=rt | distance is rate times time |
| F=ma | Force is mass times acceleration |
| m=ρV | mass is density times volume |
| V=IR | (Ohm’s Law) potential is current times resistance |
| s=rθ | circular arc length is radius times subtended angle in radians |
| F=kx | (Hooke’s Law) Force is constant of elasticity times length of distortion |
| A=PB | percentage is percent times base |
| F=PA | Force is pressure times area (definition of pressure) |
| A=lw | Area (of a rectangle) is length times width |
| c=vn | Velocity of light in a vacuum is velocity of light in a substance times the index of refraction |
When viewing the formulas in the left column, it should be clear that in each case one quantity is equal to the product of two other quantities. From a mathematical perspective it doesn’t make any difference whether the quantities are mass, resistance, percent, or index of refraction. From a mathematical perspective all of those formulas could be replaced with z = xy or A = BC or l = sx. The only thing the formula expresses is a mathematical relationship between the quantities. The formula is detached from the particular discipline which gave rise to the formula. With an elementary understanding of equations, one can see that in each of the above cases if two of the quantities are known the third can be calculated.
For example, you do not need to know the physics of springs or the research work done by Robert Hooke (1635 – 1703) to determine the amount of force required to stretch a spring with a known constant a prescribed distance. You simply substitute the known numbers into the formula Hooke so generously left for us and compute the product.
It certainly is not true that all mathematical models are as simple as those listed above, but the principle remains the same, the mathematical model is detached from everything non-mathematical.
Problems involving percent deserve special attention because they are undeservedly the most misunderstood and maligned problems in our society.
Percent means parts per hundred. The word comes from the Latin phrase per centum,
which means per hundred. In mathematics, we use the symbol % for percent. This
definition leads us to conclude that percent is a rate just as speed is a rate. Compare
the following two statements:
60 mph means 60 miles per 1 hour
60% means 60 parts per 100 parts
Percent problems are no different than distance, rate, time problems.
Some confusion is created by careless and incorrect use of the words percent and percentage. The correct use of these words is defined by the formula:
Percentage = (Percent)(Base)
Percent is the rate while percentage is the number obtained by multiplying the base by the percent.
If you remember this formula and the meaning of the terms, then a “percent problem” is as easy as a distance, rate, time problem.
The major cause of confusion about percent problems is caused by the multitude of goofy methods of teaching the subject. A cursory examination of books or of Google will uncover many different ways to present the topic of percent. While a good many of these methods will produce “the right answer” very few will produce an understanding of the concept. Moreover, they invariably unduly complicate the process.
The Transitive Property for equality of real numbers states that if a, b, and c are real numbers such that a = b and c = b, then a = c.
A less cryptic statement of this property might be: If two real numbers a and c are individually equal to a third number b, the original two numbers a and c are equal.
An even less precise, but correct, statement of this property which is quite useful for constructing mathematical models is:
It two expressions represent the same quantity, the two expressions must be equal.
Subject to the conditions of the very first sentence of the Disclaimer section of this essay, The key to every “word” problem, or “application” problem, or “modeling” problem is this interpretation of the Transitive Property. However, whenever the model is a well established formula it is wise to use the formula (what was a key step in deriving that formula? – make a guess).
Translating a verbal statement into an equation is always accomplished by finding two algebraic expressions for some single quantity in the verbal statement. Since these two expressions represent the same quantity, they are equal. Expressing that relationship (equality) with an = symbol produces the desired equation (model).
It is important for you to understand that all “translations” must be from normal English into the language of Algebra. The final statements must be algebraic statements which lend themselves to algebraic manipulation. For example it is not good enough to say p is 3 times as long as w. You must write p = 3w.
Sketches help to organize your thinking. Sometimes those sketches are actual
drawings of the situation and in other cases the sketches may simply be diagrams (Venn,
hierarchy, flow, tree, network, maps, mind map, etc.) to show relationships. A
good definition (not stipulative) of diagram is:
A diagram is a two-dimensional geometric symbolic representation of
information according to some visualization technique.